<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Plus Orwellian</title>
	<link>http://forwardtoyesterday.com/2007/01/10/double-plus-orwellian/</link>
	<description>It's hip to be moribund!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://forwardtoyesterday.com/2007/01/10/double-plus-orwellian/#comment-61102</link>
		<author>bob</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://forwardtoyesterday.com/2007/01/10/double-plus-orwellian/#comment-61102</guid>
		<description>Hey JPGIII! 

Nice to know someone actually reads these links...I think a lot of conservatives of the more educated variety or who, like Luntz, perceive themselves as moderates, like to claim various mantles and Orwell is nearly perfect because he combined socialism (the same thing as being a Democrat!) with anticommunism and antifascism, too (they think they're against it, except when, of course, they cozy up to the Pinochet of the moment)...also, to be fair, it's possible to be influenced by people with very different politics than your own -- two of my favorite authors (Dostoyevsky and James Ellroy) are rightwingers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JPGIII! </p>
<p>Nice to know someone actually reads these links&#8230;I think a lot of conservatives of the more educated variety or who, like Luntz, perceive themselves as moderates, like to claim various mantles and Orwell is nearly perfect because he combined socialism (the same thing as being a Democrat!) with anticommunism and antifascism, too (they think they&#8217;re against it, except when, of course, they cozy up to the Pinochet of the moment)&#8230;also, to be fair, it&#8217;s possible to be influenced by people with very different politics than your own &#8212; two of my favorite authors (Dostoyevsky and James Ellroy) are rightwingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John P. Garry</title>
		<link>http://forwardtoyesterday.com/2007/01/10/double-plus-orwellian/#comment-61099</link>
		<author>John P. Garry</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://forwardtoyesterday.com/2007/01/10/double-plus-orwellian/#comment-61099</guid>
		<description>Has anyone told Luntz that Orwell was a Democratic Socialist?--at least when Orwell wrote "The Lion and the Unicorn: Socialism and the English Genius"?

Orwell was anti-communist as well as anti-fascist, so that might make Orwell okay to conservatives.

John P. Garry III</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone told Luntz that Orwell was a Democratic Socialist?&#8211;at least when Orwell wrote &#8220;The Lion and the Unicorn: Socialism and the English Genius&#8221;?</p>
<p>Orwell was anti-communist as well as anti-fascist, so that might make Orwell okay to conservatives.</p>
<p>John P. Garry III</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
